Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | beckford's commentslogin

The part about being hardware-agnostic sounds something like ROS 2, but maybe at a higher level. I would love to see a post about that (with a bit of explainers for people like me who only lightly dabble with robotics).

But I'm also curious to know if the "Salem" name was searched first. When I first saw the title I thought it was talking about Agility Robotics, which is based in Salem, Oregon and is currently 3rd spot on Google search for "Salem Robotics" (and 4 of the top 5 results on YouTube).


The most important lines to me are the CFTC Chairman's quote:

> These are financial exchanges that offer financial instruments and operate across state lines. They match the bid from a resident of one state with the offer of a resident from another state and submit the trade to a clearinghouse that backstops the transactions of customers throughout the country. New York has no business regulating these interstate financial markets.

If true, it seems quite irrelevant that NY is limiting its suit to NY customers. NY would be restricting trade to people in other states. (I am not a fan or user of Kalshi)


Isn't this how gambling works though? You and I place a similar value of chips on a table, then the winner walks it over to a third party (the counter at the casino) to exchange the chips for currency?


It's a relatively uncommon structure for gambling, and things that do work that way (like casual sports bets between friends) are often exempt from local gambling laws. Traditional sports betting was done directly between a gambler and their sportsbook of choice at whatever profit-maximizing odds the bookie chose.


In other parts of the world, betting exchanges like BetFair operate this way, but unlike Kalshi, there's no pretence that what's occurring is anything other than gambling, and they are heavily regulated like other sports betting operators.


Which I think is obviously where the US is going to settle in the long term. Just a question of how many people lose their shirts before we get there.


In Australia, where legal online sports betting is everywhere, it's hugely unpopular with everyone except the bookmakers, TV networks (for whom betting ads during sports broadcasts are the one remaining decent revenue stream), a relatively small group of gamblers (many of whom gamble enough for it to pose serious problems for them and their families), and the nominally socially-democratic politicians running the federal government (who were more than happy to ban social media for teens despite the evidence being ambiguous at best, but are amazingly reluctant to tackle this, despite the demonstrated harm).

Put the genie back in the bottle and ban online sports betting. If somebody wants to place a bet on sport, make them physically go to a betting shop or the racetrack.


OK if we put that Genie back in the Bottle can we also go back to a time when Attorneys could not advertise on TV.

How much did that ruling cost?

Ambulance chasers have always been a thing but now it is nationwide syndicate of "Doctor Lawyers".

Total Shitshow for TV viewers...

Talking about "Varginal Mesh" lawsuit in front of children..

Disgusting.


In gambling, you are betting against the sportsbook run by the house, not peers.


It would be trivial though to do the same thing for sports. Create the market, contracts on either side....

How is Kalshi paid today? They take a cut of each transaction, just like the bookmaker does. Neither cares who wins or loses

Turning it around, the bookmaker really isnt who you bet against, I get that technically you do. but in practice.... You bet against all the other bettors. Bookmakers offset bets with other bookmakers, etc if the balance is off.

In practice bookmakers arent trying to be on one side or the other in a bet. Some do, but they dont last long. They want the odds to make a 50/50 market in bets and they pocket the vig.

Oversimplified but that is the gist of it. Also, my knowledge of bookmaking is from my neighborhood and I assume the legal variety works the same way though.


Generally, but that isn't a requirement. You're saying poker isn't gambling?


That’s pretty normal though, and has been for ages. A lot of states have random laws around the things you can sell there, even though it would prevent an out of state entity from selling the product there.

Liquor laws come to mind, you usually need special distribution stuff per state.

It would be a wild expansion of the commerce clause to prevent states from regulating what can be sold inside the state.


They did the same for a Samsung Fold phone delivered to me last month (in the US).


Awesome! How did you find that out?


It was written in the GitHub bio.


Using fragments for secure data has been discussed before on hn: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23036515. Tldr: it may not go directly to the server (unless you are using a buggy browser or web client) but the fragment is captured in several places.


That hasn't been true for a few years at least. https://www.jetbrains.com/help/clion/cmake-debug.html is has had CMake debugging since cmake 3.27. Ditto for vscode and probably other C IDEs I am not familiar with. So does Gradle for Java. GNU make is hardly exclusive.


> One reason is that far more of their students actually applied than would be expected.

This sentence is buried midway through the article. It would be good for a future post to expand on this ... how much is explained by students simply applying more frequently to their local schools. This explanation was the only plausible explanation in the article I saw answer "why".


> students simply applying more frequently to their local schools

Cheaper to live at home nowadays


If you were looking at the parse link in the author's comment, you were looking at a spec (called a module interface in OCaml/OxCaml, similar to an interface in Java). The parse implementation is at https://github.com/avsm/httpz/blob/240051dd5f00281b09984a14a...

That said, I would be happy if all I needed to type in was a spec.


Since the link is paywalled, the TLDR paragraph is:

> Boasberg said in the ruling that the FTC had incorrectly excluded YouTube and TikTok from the market where it challenged Meta's dominance. "Even if YouTube is out, including TikTok alone defeats the FTC’s case," the judge said.

I agree. Meta does not have a monopoly since they compete with TikTok.


> The first main disadvantage is that they require the kernel to support syscall tracing, which essentially means they only work on Linux. I have Ideas™ for how to get this working on macOS without disabling SIP, but they're still incomplete and not fully general; I may write a follow-up post about that. I don't yet have ideas for how this could work on Windows, but it seems possible.

On Windows, Linux, and also macOS with SIP disabled (as implied, disabling is a bad idea), the https://github.com/jacereda/fsatrace executable exists today and can trace filesystem access. It is used by the Shake build system.

In particular, https://neilmitchell.blogspot.com/2020/05/file-tracing.html mentions that Shake copies system binaries to temporary folders to workaround the SIP protection. That blogpost also mentions other problems and solutions (like library preloading).


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: