Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | designerarvid's commentslogin

Isn’t it funny how Freud, and probably earlier thinkers, have suggested exactly that the mind is layered like this.

Is there some way to jailbreak your tv and run som open source os on it? Or something like that?

Not exactly sure what I’m after, but the problem is acute and widely prevalent, so there has to be some solution.


You can root most LG TVs but I'm not sure an alternative firmware exists or if it's even feasible.

https://cani.rootmy.tv/


Ahh that’s great - been waiting for something that works with my firmware for my LG TV (a C1). Any idea, once rooted, what commands I can run just to disable all the ads, bloatware and spyware?

No idea unfortunately. I had good success at blocking ads just via DNS (Pi-Hole or equivalent), but I have no idea if it does anything for the spyware.


Probably just never give it internet access and plug in an HTPC with some form of Linux (I've heard KDE's Plasma Bigscreen is better than ever, though I haven't tried it myself)

I do this, but increasingly modern TVs complain about not being connected to the internet in general. Usually once every day or two I get a pop up on my Samsung 90F complaining that network access of required for some feature that seems to run on a timer.

This is the right solution. I would be tempted to go one step further: disassemble the TV and remove the WiFi card, antennas, and other unneeded hardware such as microphones or cameras. Same treatment as modern cars with cellular modems.

Sure, but that’s not a feasible solution for end-users, or people who hasn’t got all the free time

I wonder if there's MCX 50 ohm resistors...

My understanding is that this is difficult due to DRMd content refusing to work with Free operating systems.

Because yes, this nonsense would never fly in a world where Software Freedom enabled a competitive market for TV operating systems.


Not entirely unlike XKCD 1958 [0]. "I guess it's just that most people aren't murderers"

[0]: https://xkcd.com/1958/


Clear and interesting names is extremely good customer experience. Most companies name their products straight from the ERP system, creating incomprehensible codes that sounds like they come from Star Trek.

Ikea has pioneered so much within service design (design beyond the actual product). The in-store journey, the self-assembly, the assembly instructions, clear naming, clear product display, in-store restaurant experience. The list goes on.

After Ingvar Kamprad retired, he continued travelling the world to do store inspections. Full-day walkthroughs that started in the morning at the loading bay and continued throughout the store. Everything was inspected and a list of follow-up actions was created for the store manager.


At the opposite end of the spectrum we have Sony Mobile, where product names are probably assigned by their worst enemy.

You can fully expect them to release a high end phone called

    Xperia one II 10
as successor to last year's

    Xperia one III
And also a low-end phone called

    Xperia II 10 Ultra 

Making it impossible for buyers to know which phone to buy this year.


Microsoft's school of naming versions, windows (95->98->xp->vista->seven->8...) and xbox (360, one, series x)


Don't worry, Microsoft has addressed their naming difficulties by determining that everything they ever make will now be called CoPilot.


They tried for a while to call everything .NET


> At the opposite end of the spectrum we have Sony Mobile, where product names are probably assigned by their worst enemy.

Or maybe the USB-IF


Reminded me of something not as bad as that, but: another Japanese company (Shimano) also has confusing (to my American brain) product progression.

Currently, their road groupsets rank like this (low to high):

  Claris (8-speed)
  Sora (9-speed)
  Tiagra (10-speed)
  105 (12-speed, available in both mechanical and electronic)
  Ultegra (12-speed, electronic)
  Dura-Ace (12-speed, electronic)
More niche, but Ltwoo (Chinese bicycle parts maker) uses "R9" for its 11-speed groupset offering and "RX" for its 12-speed.


Right, and if you want to buy a mechanical front derailleur for your road bike one of the most loved models for decades has been the Ultegra FD: https://fish.shimano.com/en-US/product/reels/spinning/frontd...

And here is Shimano Tiagra which costs much more: https://fish.shimano.com/en-US/product/reels/conventional/le...

They also have a line of bicycle components called Nexave for city riding. Here's one Shimano Nexave product: https://fish.shimano.com/en-US/product/reels/spinning/frontd...

Oh and here is Shimano Clarus: https://fish.shimano.com/en-US/product/rods/muti-species/cla...

Shimano also make mountain bike components. SLX are a nice midrange set, for example: https://fish.shimano.com/en-US/product/rods/bass/slx_casting...

They even sell cycling specific sunglasses called Technium: https://fish.shimano.com/en-US/product/rods/salmon_steelhead...


The wordless instructions are generally great, except in the occasional instance where there's a confusing panel or two.

Has anyone ever seen an academic analysis of the visual "language" used ? Or even any articles about it, serious or humorous ?


My guess is just that they are quite serious about user testing the manuals. 3-4 iterations and you're good to go. Many companies would never imagine that you could test manuals.


“Journey” is an interesting way to frame purposefully creating an incomprehensible maze to force end users to walk through the entire warehouse. One of the worse “clever” design philosophies I’ve seen, it’s actively user hostile


If everything considered 'user hostile' on this forum actually was, the world economy would look very different. People love going to IKEA.


Either point out weaknesses in the study, or dubious funding behind it etc. Or just stick with saying that you prefer tea.


it could be that coffee acts directly on the endocrine system as they suggest, or coffee allows you to work out longer (or work out at all since you don't want to sit still) which leads to the effects they observed

I'm curious why they don't mention tea actually, are they suggesting it's not the caffeine that's doing it?

granted recent studies showed decaf coffee has some benefits itself, so it could be some of the other compounds present in coffee, but a discussion of this would be useful


Decaf still has caffeine; about 30% of the original from the bean iirc.

Tea, as well as caffeine, has other compounds that are calming.

And yes, there are plenty of other compounds in coffee, as well as purely psychological effects.


FDA requires 97% reduction to claim “decaf”. Swiss Water Process removes 99.9% for example.


Thanks, I got it wrong. Not sure where I got 30% from.


Or possibly one of those who stick to only water.


Or links between the study and coffee industry


AmishNews


What if someone reasoned similarly regarding hydrogen bombs? It would not be considered a serious argument.

Though, Altman has said that something like the IAEA for AI is needed.


I think that is the exact reasoning used wrt to nuclear bombs and it was probably correct


That similar reasoning is there: using fission for power generation instead of banning fission altogther?


What problem is that a solution to? Is there a problem with someone owning it, in that case: what?


consignment to existence as a cloud serf. paying rents to have your data held hostage and exploited by a third party. maybe these aren't problems for you


Maybe you have enemies that can coerce your service providers into shutting parts of your business down. It happened to WikiLeaks.


I don't think that's what Nostr solves. It's more like an interoperability layer.


> Is there a problem with someone owning it

Yes

> what?

They can decide you can't use it anymore

They can decide to charge more for it

They can arbitrarily take features out from under you or change how it works

They can read and/or sell/give away/accidentally get exploited and lose your data

They can prevent your extracting your data to move away from them

They can prevent you building or integrating other tools

They control how you can modify or configure the software

...


Some ppm less perhaps


They’re apertures; symbolically things emerge from them.

“…but that’s really all a butthole is, an aperture” - Louis CK


Aperture Science

We do what we must because we can For the good of all of us, except the ones who are dead


This explains so much.


We doodoo what we must.


No, they're definitely the reverse. They're "the singularity." Most obviously clear in Grok's which is a literal pictogram of a black hole. But these are entities that suck things up, not produce things.

The mental model of the superintelligence, to a true believer, is much more like a thing that consumes our world (hopefully for the better) rather than a thing that exists within the world and "produces stuff" in it.


Perfect analogy for AI actually a reverse butt-hole that sucks up the internet like a blackhole and then you go to it and it shits out as much of an answer as you are willing to feed it by massaging it with electrical stimulation. And now our digital world is being contaminated with all of this digital fecal matter further hastening the enshittingulatity.


Claude’s logo is closer to a dandelion than an aperture (though closer to a butthole than either)


Tuffing is “tough guy”, somewhat appropriate


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: