Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | sharken's commentslogin

I think it's nearly impossible to explain the benefit of not seeing such a popup to most people.

It comes down to the joy of doing things, and if the joy of using said monitor depends on a popup not being shown, then so be it.

I hope that the popup can be removed :)


More often than not, what matters is transforming a concept into working code that is good enough.

The easier part is maintaining and tweaking that code, but do not underestimate the value of the former.


I agree, Bob is great. I think scaling a concept is also really really important. We need features but we need scalable frameworks and platforms to support these features. Bob's not going to write the distributed db system that makes his feature look good, but that also needs engineering. That too needs to be good enough to ship and no more btw, but it's more often the work of a team that has to slow down and think carefully about what it's doing, especially when evolving long-running platforms


When using the browser, what Anthropic calls Claude.ai, the memory is stored on your account on their servers.

Claude code stores memory locally on the device, similar to how a developer stores notes.

Data retention is about storing your raw conversation data.

Capabilities and Privacy settings are used to manage memory and data retention.


In general not really, but I do understand why it's a bit underwhelming to buy the clock upfront.

With that said, the project is really cool and showcases the different watch faces well. For me that's the most interesting part, not how I construct a round LCD screen.


Indeed, reusing "Chat Control" and giving it a new meaning is a surefire way to cause confusion.

And the underhanded way of trying to get something as controversial as this to pass, says a lot about the politicians pushing this agenda.

Chat Control is about allowing mass surveillance and removing privacy, no should be the obvious answer here.


I think you're misunderstanding something here. "Chat Control" is a term invented and popularized by privacy groups who oppose any scanning of private chats for any purpose; any confusion caused by having the same term refer to different things has to be laid at their feet, although they argue it's appropriate because any kind of scanning is abusable in basically the same ways. The people who support scanning private chats don't use the term "Chat Control".


Well, of course politicians will try and hide what the law is about, so I find it necessary to clearly communicate what this legislation is about.

CSAM hides behind an acronym and seems benign at first, but taking away the citizens right to private chats is anything but that.


Claude Opus 4.8 suggests "ReGRAM", which is less bad than GRAM.


In that sense AI is a tool much like a dictionary, it enhances and I'd say improve the end result.


The difference is that I will retain what I drew out from the dictionary the next time. If people use Ai this way for writing, great! What many of the "enhanced-by-ai" arguments sound like is that this will be an indefinite outsourcing.

Use them to get better, like how reading good writing directly (not summarized) will also make you a much better writer. Learn from the before and after so next time there isn't a need to reach for Ai.


Given the current state of the Chrome family of browsers and the anti adblocker stance from Google, i'd think that alone would guarantee Firefox a steady user base.

Not sure how users cope with Chrome-based browsers and intrusive ads.


That's just a wishful thinking. Too many ordinary users accept ads as inevitable annoyances and don't even know about the very existence of adblockers.


Maybe because they don't know any better.


Of course, but how would you convince them to switch? Not just your friends, but as a whole.


You could suggest installing Firefox next to Chrome and install uBlock Origin on it. Open YouTube and show them that there are zero ads. They will likely see a contrast.


If only they could see ads for ad blockers.


I've tried a few times to convince people in my life who would self describe as "bad with computers" to download an adblocker, but they usually find the friction too high. Adding extensions is unfamiliar for most, and even if it seems very basic for us, the non-tech people I know don't really want to deal with the risk of unknown unknowns from that, let alone switching to a healthier browser. (Perhaps reasonable since it feels like these days half the extensions on the Chrome Web Store are spyware or adware behind the scenes.)

I also suspect that those who lived through the days of frequent Windows errors and Chrome running out of memory all the time often expect software to fail in weird and unexpected ways, and a lot of people adopt a "don't fix it if it isn't broken" mindset.

Still, uBlock Lite and Brave browser are definitely easy wins and I'm glad to see more random people in my life using them than I would have expected. :)


If it's the computer of an older family member or something, just put Firefox and ubo on their system for them and be done with it. They will use whatever software is preloaded, and being shown how to use it is a much lower barrier to entry than the cognitive load of finding, vetting, installing, and configuring new software.

I used to try to patiently explain why people should do xyz. Now I explain to people why I'm going to change xyz on their device, and if they don't slam the breaks I just do what needs to be done right then. If someone doesn't know what an adblocker is they are getting one so they can see for themselves and reflect on what companies have been putting them through for years to make some incremental amount of money.


The last time uBlock Origin caused me any pain was a on a toys r us rewards management site.


That's really funny. Yes, in case it wasn't clear for others reading this and thinking about installing these, it's almost certain that uBlock Origin and Brave browser will not cause you any problems and if you're using stock Chrome I really encourage you improve your situation dramatically for ~5 minutes worth of effort.


Not to mention a Facebook simulator :)


Also missing (I think) are anecdotes about previous experiences involving famous people or just memorable moments in history.

Also comments where the poster shares details from their own life instead of just commenting on the topic.

But I can't really describe this "human Factor" any better than through examples.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: