Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

"NO value" is a huge stretch IMO. Sure, it's entirely possible for gaping security holes to be introduced in future releases, but if past versions have been consistently vouched for as secure, that's still going to increase my confidence in future versions being secure. Or if I'm paranoid, then where possible I can just stick to a specific version which has been vouched for as secure.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: