Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

As a British person I find it sad (and slightly scary) that the best advice given to him is to start carrying a gun.


Does he really have to own the gun or does he just have to declare his camera as a gun?


This. The GP got it wrong. The suggestion was to use something "sortof" gun-like to declare that the case contains a weapon, so that the TSA has to list (and treat) according to the rules for these things.

The one giving the advice said that he has a "starter pistol", which google explained as a gun that you use to start a race etc.. Not a real weapon. Others suggested a flare pistol (Dangerous? Sure. But not a 'weapon', but more a tool).

I find it sad that these workarounds seem to help and that they are deemed necessary. But "bring a gun" is not what they are suggesting here.


http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2006/09/expensive_came...

The article referenced, which I read, had this:

"Then someone has the brilliant suggestion of putting a firearm in your camera-equipment case"

Matt Brandon (the blogger referenced) had the genius move of using a starter pistol rather than a handgun.

However, it is still sad and slightly scary to me that the solution to protecting your property during a flight is to pack it with a weapon or something that looks like weapon.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: