Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It still seems very moderate compared to the fascist imperialist spirit amongst the elite (and majority of the overall population) of that other country..


[flagged]


If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck then what do you think it might be?

So because Russians did something right* 80 years ago they have a permanent moral high ground in perpetuity?

How does that make any sense?

*of course let’s not get into how WW2 started and how would Germany would have had a much harder time defeating France with their horse powered military without massive Soviet support..).


Yes and let us remind ourselves that they only did this once they were themselves backstabbed by the Nazis that they very eagerly allied with just 2 years prior. In fact, they happily divvied up Poland with said Nazis. There is no doubt about Russia's intentions for Eastern Europe had the Ribbentrop-Molotov alliance held.

You must be trolling to try and come here preaching that Russia were good guys in WW2.


I’d guess Stalin’s idea was to fund (literally, Germany wouldn’t have had enough oil without the Soviets) the nazi invasion of France and then swoop and “liberate” Europe after a couple of years of brutal WW1 style fighting.


A lot changes in 80 years, and fascism and communism are both totalitarian ideologies.


Communism gave my parents and (younger) me free Education, free Healthcare and very cheap Housing, I don't care about its supposed totalitarianism, I just want that back, can I?


Depending on where live now you can try asking for asylum in North Korea? They’d probably love a western defector in a time like this.

Also you want what back? To be younger? Because all of those things are available in much of western world.

You might say “housing” but while it was technically cheap in the USSR it was extremely limited. There was never enough housing for everyone and multiple generations often had to live in tiny “affordable” apartments.


Hm, that seems like a false dichtonomy.

Why could it not be both?


[flagged]


Do you lack the general sense of time and can’t tell if we’re living in the 1940s or 2020s?

Surely Russia can’t be imperialist wither because they defeated Napoleon back in 1813? (your “argument” makes about as much sense).


the Brits defeated Napoleon, and that's why there never was a British empire.


Well of course. They saved Europe from tyranny. It would be the definition of historical revisionism to claim they could do anything wrong after that.

Also I wouldn’t say that Waterloo was more important than Leipzig or Napoleon’s trip to Moscow.


"We fought Nazis once, so we can't be Nazis ourselves"? Sounds... Interesting...




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: